Just like my gripe that American society has become utterly adverse to the idea of sacrifice or the idea of thinking about others or your community, my gripe that Boston sports fan’s need to be taken down from their high horse is a common refrain on this site. But if you’ll allow me, I’d like to throw one more piece of evidence on the pile.
I feel like I rag on Bill Simmons, aka the Sports Guy, an awful lot and I’m going to do so again here, but I swear to you, I actually like reading his articles and listening to his podcasts. That said, Bill Simmons provides two perfect reasons for why Celtic fans don’t deserve an NBA championship.
First, despite denying that his argument for Kevin Garnett as this season’s MVP was a ‘homer’ pick, there is no way anyone with half a brain is buying that. Chris Paul had a monster season that was unprecedented, which is saying a lot considering all the great point guards that have come before him. Likewise, Kobe crushed the competition by himself prior to getting Gasol and then upon Gasol’s arrival he finally showed that he’s able to make his teammates better. While this wasn’t his best year in his lustrous career, he certainly deserved the MVP more than KG. And actually, in a podcast Simmons conceded that his argument for KG as MVP was flawed. But more importantly, Simmons’ most recent article points out that while KG has been the key figure in turning the Celtics around this year, he may be the reason that the Celtics fail to win a title due to his inability play well down the stretch in clutch moments. In other words, the guy who epitomizes Boston area fandom and is particularly knowledgeable about the NBA has flip flopped on the Celtic’s best player. For Simmons, KG has gone from being the MVP to being a drag on the team if the game is on the line in the fourth quarter. And it’s true, KG in the clutch constantly defers to his teammates to avoid having to take the big shot himself.
This gets to the heart of the ‘big three’ myth. While Simmons was reluctant from the beginning to call Paul Pierce, Ray Allen, and KG the ‘big three’ considering that Boston already had a ‘big three’ who won title after title, the rest of the media and indeed the players themselves relished the idea. Only recently have Simmons and writers with less insight into the NBA come to the realization that Ray Allen is a shadow of himself, which reduces the ‘big three’ to two. Throw in the fact that KG disappears in crunch time and your left with just one guy, the guy who’s been in Bean Town the whole time, Paul Pierce. And Pierce isn’t exactly clutch either. He is a streaky shooter who osculates between seeming disinterested and being a ball hog. Thus, this team that the media, including Simmons, harkened as the next great thing, has no real clutch players, which is evidenced by the fact that in game 7 against the Cavs the guy who took and converted the clutch shot was not KG, was not Ray Allen, who was on the bench for most of the fourth quarter, and was not Peirce even though he had been shooting the lights out. Instead, the clutch shot came from P.J. Brown.
My point, therefore, is that Boston’s status as the media darling means that only now, two rounds into the playoffs, do some writers even begin to chip away at the hype-created mystic unduly bestowed upon the Celtics. They are a Potemkin village of a team and that would not be allowed to go unexamined in any city other than Boston where the sports writers are more than happy to tear down every team and fan base under the sun that isn’t in Boston. Their fan base and the media are like spoiled children who insist that your toys are worthless and their toys are infallible, all the while ignorant of the fact that they are basically the same thing.
My second point, and to me the more egregious one, is that Boston fans, also like children, think they deserve anything and everything right this moment. Bill Simmons and the rest of the Boston fans looked at their team as they were coasting toward the best record in the NBA and decided that their point guard, Rajon Rondo, wasn’t up to snuff. I’ve said before that I prefer college sports to pro sports and that when you think about it, college fans know the players first and then pro fans pick them up afterwards, which kind of makes the pro only fans bandwagon fans. To this end, I saw Rondo play at the University of Kentucky and I, like any other college fan, could tell that he was destined to be a solid player in the pros. But Celtic fans weren’t happy with him because, God forbid, he was a developing star player and not an established one. Thus, Simmons and the Boston fans and Boston-loving media demanded that they snatch up Sam Cassel to replace Rondo in the starting lineup and during crunch time and to add much needed veteran leadership.
Of course anyone not looking at that move through Celtic green colored glasses was asking, “what experience does Sam have other than the experience of making it to the playoffs a couple of times and then losing?” And, “if KG is SO great and SUCH a good leader, why do they need additional veteran leadership?”
Slowly but surely, Simmons and his ilk have come around to realize that Sam is worthless in the clutch and that he yells at his teammates and that the organization and fans basically made it clear to Rondo that they thought this washed up chump was an upgrade over him. Not good for team chemistry and morale. The craziest part is that not only was Rondo solid all year long but that unlike any of the ‘big three’ he was willing to take shots in crunch time; down the stretch he was the only one who’s eyes didn’t shrink from the spotlight.
But the most egregious thing is that for his excellent play, Rondo got thrown under the bus by his coach who is a media darling of epic proportions. Doc Rivers, who can’t coach a lick, which Simmons points out often, perpetually throws his young players under the bus when his team plays poorly. He’ll say they aren’t picking up or adhering to the game plan, which is absurd because if Rivers has a game plan that would be new to me, his coaching staff, and his players. Worse still is that, returning to the KG love-fest that I spoke of in point one, KG, the guy who is supposed to represent brotherhood and the Ubuntu philosophy that Rivers is so enthralled with, has never once stood up to Rivers after he called out the young guys like Rondo. And the media and fans at best don’t admit that they were wrong to bring in Cassel when they already had a perfectly good point guard.
My point is that while Boston is certainly one of the best teams in the NBA, the amount of public attention they draw is not only an instant of blatant favoritism, but poor sports analysis. If sports people would just take a step back from the hype they’ve created around the media friendly Celtics, they’d see that “The Big Ticket” only shows up for ¾ of the movie, that Paul Pierce’s knees shake in the waning minutes, and that Ray Allen might as well be sitting at home watching the game on TV. And if they’d realize that, they’d avoid the hypocrisy of championing these guys, this team, and their fans because they’d realize that all that Ubuntu stuff goes right out the door when Rivers needs to shift the blame off himself, that KG’s idea of brotherhood apparently means being silent both in the clutch and when your teammates are getting ripped, and that the allegedly superior Boston fans clamor, bitch, and whine to the point that any intelligence that they have evaporates as they throw a temper tantrum in demanding immediate success at the expense of developing a young player.
You know what other city’s fans do that? New York. So why do Boston fans get treated like the good guys while New York fans in all sports get treated like the evil empire? It’s hypocritical, it’s phony, it’s incredibly obnoxious, and it’s why Boston fans don’t deserve an NBA title.
Dude don’t judge all Boston sports fans the same. Sure their are plenty of idiots, but with success comes more fans. And consequently more idiotic fans. I love the Celtics, but I don’t think that the Big Three should be called the Big Three yet because they haven’t accomplished anything. No Doc Rivers is not a good coach, everybody knows that by now. I love Rondo, and I was, along with many people, not too happy when Sam Cassell came to town. Then in the Atlanta and Cleveland series, many Boston fans became even angrier when Cassell started taking Rajon’s minutes. Don’t let the Boston media shape your ideas about Boston fans. Sure, if you want to use recent sport successes as the reason why Boston doesn’t deserve a title, then that makes sense. But then does San Antonio deserve a title? Or Detroit? And then I guaruntee you that more than half of the Laker fans are bandwagoners. Sure, there are plenty of ignorant Boston fans out there. But the majority of New Englanders are just passionate about their favorite teams without being stupid.
I’ll be the first to admit this is a sweeping generalization, something I do a lot. And certianly there must’ve been many Boston fans that were happy with Rondo and didn’t want Sam Cassell to be brought on board.
My point was that bc the media feds the hype that Boston/New York fans seem inclined too it gets so over the top that the true fans are completely obscured. Thus you get a situation where someone like you is in the minority and someone who doesn’t want to wait for Rondo to develop is in the majority. The Celtics then respond to the outcry of the fanatical and unsubstantive majority by going out and getting Cassell.
To me that is the inherent problem with Boston area sports. They are lovable, but that makes them extremely popular. Being popular isn’t bad in and of itself, but add to it the media frenzy that surrounds Boston/New York and the rest of the country feels like they’re being TOLD to love Boston team and TOLD to hate New York teams. But the rest of us see them as one in the same.
That said, the Celtic’s turnaround was amazing and I actually like KG. So it isn’t the Celitics that I hate, it is the frezy that latches on to Boston teams and then drives them to even more overhyped extremes. If I were a Boston fan, I can’t imagine how insane this would drive me. It’d be like having your car highjacked and then having the whole country tell you that the highjacking was a good thing.
OH, and you’re absolutely right about Laker fans being bandwagoner. However, I think most people realize that and accept it. When the Hawks came out of no where Atlanta people got on the bandwagon, Jim wrote a post about it a while ago on this site, but we all admitted it. It’s like pleading guilty.
With the Red Sox and Celtics there are bandwagon fans but somehow the media and even society perpetuate this idea that ALL Boston fans are REAL fans who are knowledgable.
I just want the media to stop treating the Celtics and Sox as if this weren’t true.
Alright, that’s cool. I just didn’t want you to think that all Boston sports fans are raving idiots. Another point may be that Boston is a big college town, so they obviously get a lot of bandwagoners from all the local colleges as well, which adds even more to the hype.
[...] through injury HoopsAddict Celtics continue to thrive despite shaky point guard play SP Sports Boston doesn’t deserve it FanHouse Kobe, a shirtless dwarf and a pool of snakes LA Times Bill Walton keeping in touch with [...]
fine, fine and fine, but you lose almost all credibility when you describe paul pierce as oscillating between disinterest and ball-hogedness or simply calling him not-clutch. For non-bigs and non-point gaurds there are two guys that stand above the rest, Lebron and Kobe (in the other order) - other then those two there is nobody better than pierce. He has the Lebron advantage of being bigger and stronger than everbody else he plays against besides lebron and he is so big and strong that that really bothers lebron who is used to having a bigger advantage in that department. He plays d very well, better than lebron, adding serious length and strength to the perimeter d, he boards as well as anybody at the 3 besides marion and odom but marion really played the four and odom really is a 4, only kobe’s offense is plainly better than his, he is a pure shooter, his footwork is flawless, he can post up, slash without the the ball, create space for a step-back that he drills, hit threes, hit free-throws, handle the ball(so long as he has team-mates to pass to) and he is the one guy that can always create his own shot. Bigs and PG’s are hard to come buy, lebrons and kobes should bever carry s’s at the end because they happen once every ten or twenty years if we are lucky, short of that, there is nobody in the league I would rather have than paul pierce. go ahead, try to name some, ginobili? wade? mcgrady? prince? none of these guys really match up.
Again, not really disputing your piece, but I can’t even get to that point if I have to go through your characterization of paul pierce.
by, not buy, sorry shoulda proof read
Let me try to respond to everyone in an orderly manner.
1. Me, is Boston really a college sports town? I honeslty don’t know. As a Southerner I just sort of write off the North as pro sports fanatics and the South is college sports fanatics. Maybe Boston is a pocket of college fans, but to me that sort of feels like bandwagoning. Like if you asked a BC student who their favorite team was they’d say Red Sox, Pats, or Celtics and not BC. But like I said, I don’t know that.
2. As for Paul Pierce, I like your comment, but I disagree with you. Maybe disinterested is the wrong way to put it but you have to admit that he has a tendency to get into a phase where he just chucks things up.
3. You wouldn’t rank Kobe above LeBron? I like LeBron more, but Kobe is better on defense so I’d give him the edge. Unless you want to factor in their effect on team chemistry or contract length and age I don’t see how I could, as of right now, rank LeBron over Kobe.
4. Back to Paul. He is a good player. I think he chucks it up as I said in point number 2, but even if we forget that let me list some non-bigs I’d rather have than Paul if I were a GM:
Melo - can’t shot 3s but younger and drives and post up better than Pierce. I think he’s about even with Pierce, so this one is more of a toss up.
Wade - injury prone, which Pierce is not, but I think he’d make your team more dynamic that Pierce would. He can play the point, which is invaluable, or the shooting guard where guys like Pierce can’t gaurd him cause he’s too quick.
Chris Paul/Deron Williams - young point guards about to become great players.
5. Again, Pierce is good and can play the 2 or 3, which is nice, but I’m not as sold on his defense as you are and it kills me when he starts throwing up bad jumpers for no reason. Still, can he compete with Kobe and LeBron? Sometimes. But there’s not consistency and at teh end of the game he does one of two things; throw up a bad shot or defer to someone else. That isn’t clutch. I can’t remember when this was, but wasn’t there a game where he had two free throws at the end of a playoff series to win the game and he missed them because his knees were visably shaking?
Overall, Pierce to me is like a less talented but taller version of Allen Iverson. He has skills, but sometimes they get in the way of winning.
i agree kobe over lebron for sure, i wrote lebron then kobe just cause that is how it came into my head, but immediately said, hold on, read that the other way around.
After last night’s game I wish he would stop deferring and chuck up more stuff since RA’s stuff isn’t working and KG refuses to do it. somebody has to do it and pp seems like the best option.
Yeah, I think the fact that you made me think about who I’d take over PP made me realize that he actually is one of the better non bigs in the NBA. My problem with him is that he’ll have one big game and then follow it with a game where he shoots 1 for 19. Again, I liken that to Allen Iverson.
But to the original point of my post, what bothers me is not that the Celtics aren’t good and deserving of attention, they are. And it isn’t that Paul Pierce and KG aren’t good and deserving of attention, they are (Ray Allen isn’t). What bothers me is that the Celtics, PP, and KG get soooo overhyped bc the sports media loves Boston. And their love of Boston overshines the fact that PP, in my mind, isn’t clutch (that is debatable, but I need someone to explain to me why in game 7 he didn’t take the clutch shot and instead PJ Brown did for me to believe that he wants the ball in his hands when the game is on the line). It overshines the fact that KG disappears in the final minutes bc he’s too unselfish. It overshines the fact that Rivers is a horrific coach and that when he throws Rondo under the bus KG, the supposed leader, doesn’t stick up for Rondo. And it overshines the fact that they didn’t need Cassell.
There are certainly plenty of die hard Boston fans, but the overhyped thing around those teams leads to the non-informed bandwagon fans demanding that they pick up Sam Cassell when all the knoledgable real fans are aware that Sam I am isn’t an upgrade from Rondo.
[...] beat the crap out of the Lakers despite the fact that I wrote a post that specifically detailed why Boston Doesn’t Deserve It. Oh well, at least David Ortiz is still out with his (steroids related) [...]
Somehow i missed the point. Probably lost in translation
Anyway … nice blog to visit.
cheers, Passionflower!